Just five hours in May

What really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann?

User Tools

Site Tools


Index of Files

Non-English speaker may get help by Google Website translation. Translate to every language, like Portuguese, German or even Japanese:





Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
disclaimer_on_rumors [2014/02/11 21:53]
heggi
disclaimer_on_rumors [2014/02/11 22:25] (current)
heggi
Line 16: Line 16:
 **For [[accidential_killing_of_maddie|version 1]] we but have another dilemma:** Although there is big bunch of substantiated facts documented in the [[policia_judiciaria_pj|PJ-Files]] there was still no court to set up a trial. ​ Not the federal prosecutor of Portugal nor the British federal prosecutor showed much cooperativeness regarding the upset on a trial against the McCann’s. This is dubious for itself, as the found evidence is at least enough to open a trial on evidence alone in any European Country. But it gets much more dubious as when one compares the enormous support the McCann’s became from the very beginning of the events by high Politicians from the UK and also other Countries. And also in terms of big money, which paid from start on for extremely expensive top people from the best lawyers in UK and Portugal and to the best press relation support one can imagine. An unbelievable support which is still ongoing and consumed millions of pounds since. A support that could never have been paid for by the McCann'​s as they had around the day of the event nothing but very high outstanding debts. This must be seen especially in comparison to the bulk of other similar cases in UK, where there was never any such attention and far less to simply null support from Politics or from broad money. ​ **For [[accidential_killing_of_maddie|version 1]] we but have another dilemma:** Although there is big bunch of substantiated facts documented in the [[policia_judiciaria_pj|PJ-Files]] there was still no court to set up a trial. ​ Not the federal prosecutor of Portugal nor the British federal prosecutor showed much cooperativeness regarding the upset on a trial against the McCann’s. This is dubious for itself, as the found evidence is at least enough to open a trial on evidence alone in any European Country. But it gets much more dubious as when one compares the enormous support the McCann’s became from the very beginning of the events by high Politicians from the UK and also other Countries. And also in terms of big money, which paid from start on for extremely expensive top people from the best lawyers in UK and Portugal and to the best press relation support one can imagine. An unbelievable support which is still ongoing and consumed millions of pounds since. A support that could never have been paid for by the McCann'​s as they had around the day of the event nothing but very high outstanding debts. This must be seen especially in comparison to the bulk of other similar cases in UK, where there was never any such attention and far less to simply null support from Politics or from broad money. ​
  
-**Any private citizen of course may decide on his own** if he gives support to anybody or not. It is not a crime to give two doctors in severe trouble supports thousands and millions pound worth, and to give other parents in the same situation nothing at all. It is shady but legal of course. But it is much another thing for any officials like politicians or police or any government employee which have not to decide on there own but only on overriding public interests. That indeed three consecutive Prime Minsters of the UK got heavily involved in support for the McCann’s is a riddle which is not so easy to explain.+**Any private citizen of course may decide on his own** if he gives support to anybody or not. It is not a crime to give two doctors in severe trouble supports thousands and millions pound worth, and to give other parents in the same situation nothing at all. It is shady but legal of course. But it is much another thing for any officials like politicians or police or any government employee which have not to decide on there own but only on overriding public interests. That indeed three consecutive Prime Minsters of the UK got heavily involved in support for the McCann’s is a riddle which is not so easy to explain. The extraordinarily unusual support for the McCann'​s by the establishment and the political system is to provide definitely in question, because if it is true according to the documents that the McCann'​s should be guilty, then this fact would damage the rule of law significantly.
  
 From this we may conclude, **that [[special_circumstances|rumors]] in both cases** [[accidential_killing_of_maddie|Version 1]] and [[abduction_of_maddie_theory|Version 2]] are of some importance and cannot be plainly overheard. Firstly any rumor thus must namely be doubted but also must be investigated serious if it is of presumable importance to the case. This regards to burglars in Praia da Luz or Gypsies at the Ocean Club as well as to dubious connections of British establishment in the case.  From this we may conclude, **that [[special_circumstances|rumors]] in both cases** [[accidential_killing_of_maddie|Version 1]] and [[abduction_of_maddie_theory|Version 2]] are of some importance and cannot be plainly overheard. Firstly any rumor thus must namely be doubted but also must be investigated serious if it is of presumable importance to the case. This regards to burglars in Praia da Luz or Gypsies at the Ocean Club as well as to dubious connections of British establishment in the case. 
  
 ---- ----