Just five hours in May

What really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann?

User Tools

Site Tools


Index of Files

Non-English speaker may get help by Google Website translation. Translate to every language, like Portuguese, German or even Japanese:




js#bj-tango.png navbar


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
mccann_vs_amaral_libel_suit [2016/03/24 14:30]
heggi
mccann_vs_amaral_libel_suit [2016/03/24 14:31]
heggi
Line 31: Line 31:
 See also some information on the unusual //Ward of Court//​-Status for Maddie ->​[[https://​hypocriteandliar.wordpress.com/​2010/​01/​18/​see-you-in-court-mr-and-mrs-mccann/​|[1]]] and [[http://​madeleinemccann.org/​blog/​2008/​07/​07/​in-the-matter-of-madeleine-beth-mccann/​|[2]]]. See also some information on the unusual //Ward of Court//​-Status for Maddie ->​[[https://​hypocriteandliar.wordpress.com/​2010/​01/​18/​see-you-in-court-mr-and-mrs-mccann/​|[1]]] and [[http://​madeleinemccann.org/​blog/​2008/​07/​07/​in-the-matter-of-madeleine-beth-mccann/​|[2]]].
  
-See also the base decision in favour for Amaral: [[http://​joana-morais.blogspot.com/​2010/​10/​lisbon-appeals-court-ruling.html| Lisbon Appeals Court Decision on the McCann Couple Injunction +__See also the base decision in favour for Amaral: [[http://​joana-morais.blogspot.com/​2010/​10/​lisbon-appeals-court-ruling.html| Lisbon Appeals Court Decision on the McCann Couple Injunction 
-14 October 2010]]: "​...III – Decision: In harmony with what is written above, under the terms of the cited dispositions,​ the Judges at this Appeals Court declare the validity of the appeal filed by defendant Dr. Gonçalo Amaral, and the sentence of the a quo Court is revoked, its disposition replaced by the following:+14 October 2010]]:__  
 + 
 +"...**III – Decision**: In harmony with what is written above, under the terms of the cited dispositions,​ the Judges at this Appeals Court declare the validity of the appeal filed by defendant Dr. Gonçalo Amaral, and the sentence of the a quo Court is revoked, its disposition replaced by the following:
  
 The injunction is deemed not valid because it was not proved. Furthermore we deliberate that we do not acknowledge the rest of the appeals. The injunction is deemed not valid because it was not proved. Furthermore we deliberate that we do not acknowledge the rest of the appeals.