Just five hours in May

What really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann?

User Tools

Site Tools


Index of Files

Non-English speaker may get help by Google Website translation. Translate to every language, like Portuguese, German or even Japanese:




js#bj-tango.png navbar


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
tavares_almeida [2014/12/15 11:40]
heggi
tavares_almeida [2014/12/15 12:20]
heggi
Line 219: Line 219:
 ---- ----
  
 +__This was the supposed Final report (summary) of the Investigations given to the Portuguese Prosecutor.__ Three weeks later through political Interference ([[gordon_brown|Gordon Brown]] and [[jose_socrates|José Sócrates Carvalho Pinto de Sousa]]) the investigators team and prosecutor were dismissed and new people set in, who were not directly involved into the original investigations. On 2 October 2007, [[goncalo_amaral|Dr Amaral]] was removed from the investigation into Madeleine’s disappearance. The Portuguese judicial authorities then appointed a new investigation co-ordinator. He reported to the District Attorney (not the Attorney-General as stated on Wikipedia) for that region of Portugal, **Jose de Magalhaes e Menezes**. He issued a report on the investigation,​ signed off by **Deputy Attorney-General Joao Melchior Gomes**, which was made public in **July 2008**. ​
 +
 +__A new report was written which finalized as follows:​__ ​
 +
 +__On **page 4,649** his final statement:​__ //“I order…the filing of the papers concerning the suspects [[gerry_mccann|Gerald Patrick McCann]] and [[kate_mccann|Kate Marie Healy]] [the surname then used by Dr Kate McCann], as there is **no evidence that they committed any crime defined by Article 277.1** of the Code of Criminal Procedure”//​.
 + 
 +On **page 4648**, he declares: //“…it must be clearly understood that **this is not equivalent to final and irreversible closure** of the enquiry”//​.
 +
 +On **page 4647** of the same report: //“No evidence was obtained which would enable the average person…to arrive at a clear and honest conclusion as to how the child was taken from the apartment (dead or alive, and if dead whether by negligent or wilful manslaughter)”.//​ On the same page, the District Attorney adds: **//“We do not have any grounds whatsoever for saying, with the necessary degree of certainty, exactly what crime(s) may have been committed against Madeleine McCann”//​**.
 +
 +On **page 4643**, also **pages 4597-8**: //“Whilst it is an undeniable fact that Madeleine disappeared from [[apartement_5a|Apartment 5A]] in the [[ocean_club|Ocean Club]], the manner and **circumstances in which it happened are unclear**, despite the huge number of investigations,​ and the potential range of crimes suggested. **The potential range of crimes suggested** throughout the enquiry - including abduction for sexual purposes or other uses and accidental death and hiding of the body - **still stands**”//​.
 +
 +On **page 4605**: //"The **possibility of abduction** was exhaustively investigated. **No ransom was ever requested, nor were there any sufficiently consistent clues found to support this theory**”//​.
 +
 +(The McCanns rely on this report for their claim that they were //​‘cleared’//​. ​ See some more details on ->​[[http://​whathappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.com/​2013/​08/​madeleine-mccann-have-her-parents-been_9354.html|Have her parents been ‘cleared’ of any involvement in her disappearance’?​]])
 +----