How it could have happened by PJ-Files interpretation

→ see summarizing intermediate PJ-Report

Report by Chief Inspector Tavares de Almeida to the Coordinator of the Criminal Investigation: “Where he concludes, after analyzing all the evidence gathered, that the child is dead and the parents were responsible for cadaver occultation, and the entire GROUP was lying since the first day of the investigation.”

Evidence from Witnesses

1. Lying of the Tapas-Group about the Timeline: See Timeline 3rd May; The Time-Lists of the Tapas 9; The eight independent Alarm witnesses
2. Suspects Sighting: The Smiths' Sighting (ca. 22:00)

Physical Evidence

1. Cadaver Dogs
2. DNA Traces
3. Traces of →Body fluids in Apartment 5A
4. non existence of any signs of a forced entry into the Apartment 5A

Indirect evidences

1. Unusual behaviour of the parents (e.g. low interest in searching on 3rd/4th, etc.pp., samples to be filled in…)
2. The The Payne-Allegation,
3. see also Involvement of British Establishment and Rumors regarding Version 1
4. Statistics: In more than 95% of cases of young Child killing/abduction the parents and/or closely related people are involved. Also faked abductions/alleged killing by an unknown is not seldom in such cases.

See also Possible Reconstruction of the event from evidences released by the PJ

See also refutation by Abduction Hypothesis